What camera to get!

metzican

Suspension Lift
Location
Lafaytte, la
So I am going on this crazy adventure and I have never own a "nice" Camera. I would like something nice enough to capture this trip with quality pictures that it deserves. I am not interested in a point and click. But I don't want something with so many features I don't know what to do. Also with this I'm thinking two different lenses. One for "wider" pictures like landscape and mountains. The other for further away pictures hopefully of wildlife and such. I would like to stay under the $1k range. So here is my question.

What Camera would you recommend?
What lenses would you recommend?

Thanks in advance,
Derrick Metz
 

TJTJ

Skid Plates
Founding Member
Location
NJ
So I am going on this crazy adventure and I have never own a "nice" Camera. I would like something nice enough to capture this trip with quality pictures that it deserves. I am not interested in a point and click. But I don't want something with so many features I don't know what to do. Also with this I'm thinking two different lenses. One for "wider" pictures like landscape and mountains. The other for further away pictures hopefully of wildlife and such. I would like to stay under the $1k range. So here is my question.

What Camera would you recommend?
What lenses would you recommend?

Thanks in advance,
Derrick Metz

The telezooms are pretty decent now a days, but some of the "point and click" cameras have also evolved into very versatile systems....so there is an enormous range of camera options.

For example, I was out in AZ last Spring, and using just a "Point and Shoot", I was able to take some decent pics:

14652904049_43be62405f_b.jpg



14652829210_6a9b03952f_b.jpg



14816644086_061f8e9081_b.jpg



So, those are with a Canon Powershot S100...a camera that fits in your shirt pocket, etc. (The resolution of the pics themselves is MUCH sharper than the posted versions, they look softer in the posts due to site post resolution....but on your computer or a print they are razor sharp)


I find that on "adventures", you get a lot more shots if you have the camera with you than if it was too big to lug around. I used to do news and stock photography back in the '70's as one way to pay the bills, all film back then of course, but with SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses.

The interchangeable lenses do allow a degree of flexibility and shot composition that a point and shoot can't match, but, you DID NOT want features that you don't know how to use...but, the modern digital SLRs are EXTREMELY option packed.


You're best compromise might be a "Prosumer" camera, which blends the professional and consumer features....with heavy use of default settings.

That means its likely to have a simple way to say "I'm shooting a landscape....set the f stop and shutter speed and ISO accordingly", etc.

If you are well versed in how to set aperture, speed, ISO, etc, to get the depth of focus, sharpness or speed blur, and effects you want, they all have manual overrides as well.


The compromise in the point and shoots vs the interchangeable lenses is speed. The aperture of the wee camera systems tends to not be able to go, optically, as wide open as a dedicated low light lens.

A top quality zoom telephoto (which cost more than your entire budget for camera and lenses...) will maintain the same aperture (Say f 4.0, etc) as you zoom in or out...whereas the less expensive ones work just like the ones in the point and shoots, and the f stop climbs as you zoom in (So it might be F 4.0 at 50 mm but F 9 at 300 mm, and so forth).


As digital lenses have a bit of added tele effect than the 35 mm film camera equivalents...they RATE the lens in terms of what it would look like as a 35 mm camera, but, the end result is that longer range shots are EASIER to get, but, close range/wider angle shots are the hardest. (You have to back up too far to "get it all in the viewfinder"). To combat/overcome that, simply get a camera that's 35 mm equivalent lens length is wide angle, say less than 35 mm wide (85 mm is considered more of a "natural" length, but, to "get it all in" you might need closer to 25 mm for some close shots with your back against the wall, etc. This is getting closer to fish eye lengths, but, that's where you need to go sometimes.


A Powershot SX60HS for example might be a good compromise, in that its OPTICAL flexibility is wide enough to cover most of your needs w/o breaking your budget. (Only look at optical performance, as "Digital Zoom" doesn't really matter now that you can crop the pic your self later, and as long as the data is captured, you can zoom in on your computer and compose the "final" shot, w/o cutting off the peripheral data when actually shooting.
 
Last edited:

Ripper

Bought an X
Location
Western MA
I went with the Canon Rebel T5. I got it at Target for $599 a few days after Christmas. Came with a small bag, 18-55mm lens, 70-300mm lens and a 16GB card. I have been buying all my new stuff via bhphotovideo.com and they are great, Incredible prices and the reviews are right on when it come to product reviews.

Here are a few of my favorite I have captured so far.











The next two pictures where shot using a Rokinon 8mm Fisheye





The next two were shot using a Sigma DC EX 17-55mm lens, this one is great as it allows F2.8 throughout the field of adjusment



 

Jbat

First Fill-Up (of many)
Location
Utah
I agree with TJ, get something you don't have to lug everywhere. There are some very nice point and shoots nowadays that fit the bill. My wife is a photographer and has a few cameras and lenses and half the time when we are on vacation or 'adventure' we take photos with our phones or GoPro be cause her cameras can be too big and bulky to want to take or she is worried they may get broken where we are going.
 

TJTJ

Skid Plates
Founding Member
Location
NJ
I agree with TJ, get something you don't have to lug everywhere. There are some very nice point and shoots nowadays that fit the bill. My wife is a photographer and has a few cameras and lenses and half the time when we are on vacation or 'adventure' we take photos with our phones or GoPro be cause her cameras can be too big and bulky to want to take or she is worried they may get broken where we are going.

I'll add that when off road, as I might be out to spot someone, etc, and invariably, they get a tire up or something and want a pic to prove how hardcore they are, etc...or I see something I want to capture...if the camera was in a pocket, I can grab the pic...if the camera is in the rig in a camera bag, its not going to be worth it to go back, get it, came back, and THEN take the pic, etc.

If the camera is hanging on my neck from a strap, etc, and I bend down to check under-rig clearance, etc, the camera swings into rocks, etc....and I end up needing one hand for the camera even when I'm not shooting, just to keep it from getting whacked on stuff/out of the way.

So, if for adventure/trip especially action shots, the pocket cameras rock now a days....things the size of a deck of cards that can zoom to telephoto ranges, and do 5-12 frames per second, or shoot a movie, with built-in flashes and programs for different lighting scenarios at the flick of a switch, or full auto, etc...are very handy.

:D

Even profession photographers carry point and shoots in their pockets now a days, for the same reasons. Sure, for a portrait/wedding, etc, or formal landscapes with your entire purpose being to get sellable images, you count on SLRS and/or medium or even large format cameras....but the point and shoot is there when there's not time to set up the big guns. (Like a soldier with a side arm and an AR, etc)
 
Last edited:
Top